ArticleBMC public health2026
Trust in science, knowledge and risk perception as predictors of COVID-19 vaccination: application of an extended Theory of Planned Behavior model in Hungary.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- From global to local: Developing a context-specific BeSD-HPV tool through cultural and linguistic adaptation in Pakistan.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough a number of studies have shown that some form of trust plays an important role in vaccination decisions, few studies have explicitly examined trust in science. This study aims to explore the determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, with special regard to trust in science. For our empirical analysis, we focus on Hungary, a case characterized by high infection and mortality rates during the pandemic, as well as relatively low levels of trust in science. The study’s contribution to the literature is that, first, in contrast to most previous studies, it builds on an established theoretical framework, and second, within this framework, it analyses the impact of trust in science in relation to knowledge and perceived risk of COVID-19. We use the Theory of Planned Behavior (TBP) to better understand predictors of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. The key components of TBP (i.e. attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control) are extended with further predictors of attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination: trust in science, knowledge about COVID-19, and perceived risk of COVID-19. To our knowledge, ours is the first study using TPB to examine the impact of these three factors on attitudes towards vaccination in a single model.
methodsTo test our extended TPB model, we use a sample of 761 Hungarian adults from a cross-sectional survey conducted in late 2022. We apply structural equation modeling (SEM) with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance as the main endogenous variable.
resultsOur findings show that of the key components of TPB, attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination is the strongest predictor of vaccine acceptance. Perceived COVID-19 risk, COVID-19-related knowledge, and trust in science are all important predictors of attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination. Importantly, perceived risk and knowledge are also related to trust in science in a meaningful way.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that since COVID-19-related knowledge and trust in science are interrelated, vaccination campaigns cannot focus on only one or the other: knowledge without trust and vice versa are not enough to increase vaccine acceptance. However, for those with low levels of education, trust in science does not influence attitudes toward vaccination, so increasing COVID-19-related knowledge is key to fostering pro-vaccine attitudes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.