Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634646›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

A real-world multicenter study on opportunistic cervical cancer screening in hospital in China: comparison of TruScreen device, cytology, and HPV testing for detecting high-grade cervical lesions.

Chen Fei, Wen Chen, Jun Liu, Jiandong Wang, Hongyan Guo, Guonan Zhang, Yu Zhang, Qing Yang, Renfeng Zhao, Xuejun Chen and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Chen FeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Women's Health and Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, 9 Dongdan Santiao, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Wen ChenDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Jun LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100043, China.
Jiandong WangBeijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100006, China.
Hongyan GuoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Guonan ZhangDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliate Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China.
Qing YangDepartment of Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
Renfeng ZhaoDepartment of Gynecology, The Peoples Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China.
Xuejun ChenDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, China.
Manhua CuiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jilin University Second Hospital, Jilin, 130041, China.
Weidong ZhaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China.
Jiahua LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350004, China.
Yu-Ligh LiouObstetrics and Gynecology Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 102218, China.
Jinghe LangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Women's Health and Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, 9 Dongdan Santiao, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. langjh@aliyun.com.

Funding

Obstetrics and Gynecology Center 2022-PUMCH- D-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical cancer (CC) remains a major health challenge worldwide. Early detection methods and screening strategies are important for reducing both incidence and mortality rates.

objectivesThis study evaluates the clinical performance of the real-time optoelectronic device, TruScreen (TS), in detecting high-grade cervical precancers compared to standard methods [high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing, cytology, and colposcopy) in a Chinese hospital-based opportunistic screening cohort. In addition, assess the clinical effectiveness of the TS strategies alongside current guidelines and methodologies in cervical cancer screening.

methodsA multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted across 64 hospitals between September 2018 and June 2021 in China. Participants (n = 14,982 women aged ≥ 20 years) underwent TS test, hrHPV test, liquid-based cytology (LBC), and colposcopy with biopsy confirmation. Diagnostic performance [sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV)] were calculated using histopathology as the gold standard. Strategies incorporating TS test were compared to WHO-recommended guidelines.

resultsFor cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and servier lesions (CIN2+), TS test demonstrated comparable sensitivity (87.0%; 95% CI: 84.8–88.9%) to hrHPV (91.9%) and higher specificity (57.2% vs. 29.2%) than cytology (53.6%). TS test demonstrated outperformed compared to cytology in CIN3+ (sensitivity: 90.0% vs. 62.7%) and maintained high NPV (97.9%). In women aged ≥ 45 years, TS test showed comparable sensitivity (88.5%) to hrHPV test (87.9%) and higher specificity (60.1%) than hrHPV (27.5%) and cytology (46.9%) in CIN3+. Strategy 3, TS combined hrHPV testing, achieved the lowest missed cancer cases (n = 14) and balanced referral rates (19.65%), produced the best results among the methods compared.

conclusionThe straightforward operation and non-invasive detection of TS test demonstrate high sensitivity and NPV, establishing it as a viable tool for opportunistic early CC screening in hospitals, particularly among older women. The combination of TS test with hrHPV test enhances both sensitivity and specificity, thereby minimizing unnecessary colposcopies. Further large-scale studies are required to validate its long-term effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHuman Papillomavirus VirusesPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedChinaColposcopyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaeSensitivity and SpecificityCervical cancerCytologyHigh-risk HPVOpportunistic screening in hospitalTruScreen device

Identifiers

PMID41634646
PMCPMC12997704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.