Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634641›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

Barriers to accessing cancer care services in Eastern Cape and Mpumalanga provinces of South Africa: cancer survivors' perspectives.

Nolusindiso Ncitakalo, Onke R Mnyaka, Ntiyiso V Khosa, Wezile W Chitha, Sikhumbuzo A Mabunda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nolusindiso NcitakaloSchool of Public Health, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa. nncitakalo@wsu.ac.za.
Onke R MnyakaSchool of Public Health, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.
Ntiyiso V KhosaSchool of Public Health, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.
Wezile W ChithaWSU Institute for Clinical Governance & Healthcare Administration, Walter Sisulu University, East London, South Africa.
Sikhumbuzo A MabundaSchool of Public Health, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization’s 2022 estimates reported 20 million new cancer cases and 9.7 million deaths, reaffirming cancer as the second leading global cause of mortality. Equitable care requires access to prevention, early detection, treatment, and follow-up for all populations. In rural South Africa, access is shaped by structural, economic, systemic, and sociocultural factors. This study explored cancer survivors’ experiences in the Eastern Cape and Mpumalanga to understand the barriers they face in obtaining care.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted between November 2021 and January 2022 using semi-structured interviews with adult cancer survivors receiving care at tertiary referral hospitals in the rural Eastern Cape and Mpumalanga provinces of South Africa. Purposive and convenience sampling were used to recruit participants aged 18 years and older who could provide informed consent and describe their care experiences. Interviews explored diagnostic pathways, comorbidities, and barriers to accessing cancer services. Data were analysed inductively using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis, with emergent themes subsequently interpreted using the World Health Organization health system building blocks framework.

resultsThe study included 33 cancer patients aged 30–74 years attending oncology clinics. Most participants were women (n = 25) and unemployed (n = 23). Breast cancer was the most common diagnosis (n = 14), followed by cervical cancer (n = 9), with smaller numbers of prostate, thyroid, stomach and Kaposi’s sarcoma cases. Breast and cervical cancers accounted for over two-thirds of all diagnoses. Four themes that emerged were poor infrastructure, financial barriers, environmental and contextual challenges, and health system obstacles, illustrating the multidimensional barriers to rural cancer care.

conclusionThis study identifies structural, economic, and social barriers limiting cancer survivors’ access to care in rural South Africa, causing diagnostic delays, treatment interruptions, and increased vulnerability. Participant narratives reveal critical gaps in the health system and highlight the need for culturally grounded, community-responsive reforms. Enhancing access requires decentralised oncology services, strengthened referral pathways, transport and education support, and integrated psychosocial care. Coordinated efforts among policymakers, providers, and communities, informed by comparative rural–urban research, are essential to achieve equitable cancer care.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsHealth Services AccessibilityNeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRural PopulationSouth AfricaBarriersCancer care accessCancer survivorsCare pathwaysSouth africa

Identifiers

PMID41634641
PMCPMC12958648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.