Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
The effect of disaster preparedness training on knowledge and preparedness levels of pregnant women: a randomized controlled study.
Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Determinants of Midwifery Workforce Disaster Preparedness and Its Impact on the Continuity of Maternal Care: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective disaster preparedness protects pregnant women, a disadvantaged group, and reduces potential harm.
aimThis study was planned to determine the effects of training provided to pregnant women regarding disasters on their knowledge and disaster preparedness levels.
methodsA total of 140 participants (70 in the experimental group and 70 in the control group) who attended the obstetrics and gynecology outpatient clinics of a state hospital in western Turkey between November 2023 and December 2024 and met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using pre-test and post-test forms and standardized questionnaires.
resultsIt was determined that 34.3% of the pregnant women in both the experimental and control groups were aged between 26 and 30 years. In the experimental group, 34.3% of the participants were high school graduates, whereas 34.3% of those in the control group were undergraduate graduates. The mean gestational week was 33.41 ± 7.25 in the experimental group and 20.79 ± 11.68 in the control group. Following the training intervention, disaster knowledge levels of pregnant women in the experimental group increased markedly, with no incorrect responses observed in the post-test assessment. A statistically significant difference was found between the post-test total scores of the Disaster Preparedness Scale in the experimental and control groups (t = 23.23, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.93), indicating a very large effect size of the training intervention. In contrast, no statistically significant difference was found between the pre-test scores of the two groups (t = - 1.04, p = 0.30).
conclusionsThe training provided to pregnant women, a vulnerable group, emphasized the importance of pre-disaster preparedness and increased their knowledge and awareness. These findings highlight the need to integrate disaster preparedness education into routine prenatal care programs and broader clinical practice.
trial registrationRegistration was made to the Iran Randomized Clinical Research Center on June 29, 2024, with the ID IRCT20240531061964N1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.