ArticleBMC cancer2026
Prognostic stratification in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: tumor biology and diagnostic modality as a surrogate for disease burden.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastasis (PM) has a poor prognosis, yet clinical outcomes vary significantly. This study aimed to identify independent prognostic determinants of PM-specific survival (PM-OS), focusing on tumor biology and disease burden surrogate.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 166 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and PM treated at a single center between 2015 and 2024. Prognostic factors were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. To mitigate immortal time bias and confounding by indication, receipt of systemic therapy was excluded from the primary multivariable model.
resultsThe median PM-OS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.63–9.79). Patients diagnosed via surgical exploration (radiologically occult) achieved a significantly longer median PM-OS compared to those diagnosed radiologically (13.6 vs. 7.4 months; p = 0.003). In multivariable analysis, HER2 positivity (HR0.312, 95% CI 0.164–0.593; p < 0.001) and surgical diagnosis (HR 0.555, 95% CI 0.338–0.913; p = 0.020), interpreted as a surrogate for radiologically occult/low tumor burden, were identified as independent predictors of improved survival. Additionally, an optimized CA 19 − 9 cutoff (> 175.4 U/mL), unlike the standard threshold, significantly stratified survival. Traditional factors, including signet-ring cell histology and age, did not retain independent significance.In sensitivity analysis including systemic therapy, treatment was strongly associated with survival and the prognostic significance of HER2 and diagnostic context remained.
conclusionSurvival in gastric PM is fundamentally driven by HER2 status and the extent of PM. Surgical detection identifies a subgroup with limited, occult disease who achieve superior outcomes compared to those with radiologically overt metastases. Furthermore, the magnitude of biomarker elevation, rather than mere positivity, serves as a critical stratifier. These findings support a paradigm shift towards burden-based risk stratification to guide treatment intensity and clinical trial eligibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.