ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026
Prediction of recurrent ischemic stroke using machine learning from real-world data.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent ischemic stroke (RIS) is a significant challenge in Malaysia, affecting approximately 33% of patients. However, studies using artificial intelligence (AI) to predict this event using real-world data remain very limited. This study aimed to develop and evaluate Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and RUSBoost models for predicting recurrent ischemic stroke using real-world data from the Malaysian National Neurology Registry.
methodsWe established a retrospective study of 7,697 enrolled patients registered in the National Neurology Registry in Malaysia (2009-2016). We developed and evaluated several machine learning models, including SVM, KNN, and RUSBoost, to predict recurrent RIS. The Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied to the training data to handle the imbalanced data. Ten-fold cross-validation was applied to assess the robustness and accuracy of the models, and performance was evaluated using criteria of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and area under the ROC curve (AUC).
resultsAmong the evaluated machine learning models, RUSBoost demonstrated the strongest and most clinically relevant performance when assessed on validation (test) folds under stratified ten-fold cross-validation, achieving an AUROC of 0.943, sensitivity of 86.5%, and a favourable balance between sensitivity and PPV of 40.2% on the original imbalanced dataset. Although the application of SMOTE during training improved model discrimination for RUSBoost (training-fold AUROC = 0.986). The SHAP analysis showed that age, race, glucose level, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and duration of diabetes were the most significant factors linked to an increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that applying machine learning models on real-world clinical data is a promising tool for predicting the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence. RUSBoost emerged as the most reliable and generalisable model for clinical risk prediction, proved effective in improving prediction accuracy and identifying patients at highest risk. While SMOTE enhanced model learning during training. The findings highlight the importance of integrating AI technologies into clinical practice to support early treatment decisions and enhance preventive interventions, opening new pathways for better patient care and reducing the health burden from recurrent stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.