Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634585›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2026

Automatic processing of gastrointestinal endoscopy referrals and patient instructions using large language models.

Yuri Gorelik, Eyas Awawdeh, Shiri Fistel, Ariel Gralnek, Amir Klein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuri GorelikGastroenterology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. y_gorelik@rambam.health.gov.il.
Eyas AwawdehGastroenterology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Shiri FistelInformation Technology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Ariel GralnekGastroenterology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Amir KleinGastroenterology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpen-access endoscopy relies on referrals that are manually vetted, which is a resource consuming process, with potential biases. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in medical utilities, their ability to autonomously manage complex referral logistics remains understudied. We assessed whether LLMs can provide accurate recommendations on gastrointestinal endoscopy referrals.

methodsWe extracted 200 multilingual endoscopy referrals with structured and unstructured medical data. We evaluated OpenAI’s o3 and Google’s Gemini 2.5-pro. A prompt was tuned on a set of 20 referrals and tested on the remaining 180 referrals. Eight variables were tested: procedure type, indication, need for anesthesiologist, omission of anti-aggregants, anti-coagulants and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), implantable electronic devices and need for intensified preparation. LLM responses were benchmarked against expert gastroenterologists. Accuracy and F1 scores were analyzed using bootstrapping, and models compared with McNemar’s test. Confusion matrices were calculated. Additionally, o3 generated patient-specific visual timelines.

resultsAmong 200 referrals, 88 (44%) referred for colonoscopy, 53 (26.5%) for esophagogastroduodenoscopy; 65 (32.5%) required an anesthesiologist and 65 (32.5%) intensified preparation. Both models demonstrated comparable high performance, with o3 achieving 91%–100% accuracy and Gemini 2.5-pro achieving 89%–99% accuracy across all variables. There were no statistically significant differences between the models. Confusion matrix analysis confirmed high precision (> 95%) and specificity (> 91%) for both, indicating high reliability in resource allocation. Additionally, o3 successfully generated accurate, patient-specific visual instructions for all sampled cases.

conclusionLLMs are highly accurate in processing endoscopy referrals and can generate patient-specific instructions. These tools offer a promising solution to streamline endoscopy workflows, reduce physician burden, and improve patient communication.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalLarge Language ModelsPatient Education as TopicReferral and ConsultationHumansArtificial intelligenceEndoscopy referralsLarge-Language models

Identifiers

PMID41634585
PMCPMC12958611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.