ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
MUUMI: an R package for statistical and network-based meta-analysis for multi-omics data integration.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Approaches in Drug Repositioning Highlight Ouabain and Helenalin as Potential Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Fibrosis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Curated and harmonised transcriptomics datasets of interstitial lung diseases.Data in brief · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisentangling physiopathological mechanisms of biological systems through high-level integration of omics data has become a standard procedure in life sciences. However, platform heterogeneity, batch effects, and the lack of unified methods for single- and multi-omics analyses represent relevant drawbacks that hinder the extrapolation of a meaningful biological interpretation. While statistical meta-analysis is widely used to integrate several omics datasets of the same type, it does not allow the integration of multi-modal data deriving from multi-omics experiments. Network science is at the forefront of systems biology, where the inference of molecular interactomes allowed the investigation of perturbed biological systems, by shedding light on the disrupted relationships that keep the homeostasis of complex systems.
resultsHere, we present MUUMI, an R package that unifies statistical meta-analysis and network-based omics data integration within a single analytical framework. MUUMI allows the identification of robust molecular signatures through multiple meta-analytical methods, inference and analysis of molecular interactomes and the integration of multiple omics layers through similarity network fusion. We demonstrate the functionalities of MUUMI by presenting two case studies in which we analysed (1) 17 transcriptomic datasets on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) from both microarray and RNA-Seq platforms and (2) multi-omics data of THP-1 macrophages exposed to different polarising stimuli. In both examples, MUUMI revealed biologically coherent signatures, underscoring its value in elucidating complex biological processes.
conclusionsMUUMI leverages omics data meta-analysis, integration and interpretation that implements both traditional and network-based approaches to unleash the power of multi-study datasets. Statistical and network-based approaches are integrated in a unique framework, allowing the user to derive robust and biologically meaningful results from different studies and datasets. MUUMI is an open-source package and is freely available at https://github.com/fhaive/muumi .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.