ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2026
Evolutionary responses to increased opportunity for sexual selection in yeast.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating the Semantic Labyrinth of "Sex" in the Study of Reproductive Trait Evolution.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sexual selection contributes to biodiversity and the costs and benefits of sexual reproduction. In organisms where sex is infrequent, these impacts of sexual selection are likely to be limited. An increased frequency of obligate sex would increase the opportunity for sexual selection, which could promote the evolution of sexual traits and sexual differentiation. To study these dynamics, we conducted experimental evolution in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which is predominantly asexual, with two isogamous mating types. We used selectable markers to impose frequent obligate sex in 96 populations. We manipulated the opportunity for sexual selection by imposing skewed mating-type ratios, either enforcing an alternation of haploid and diploid growth or allowing unrestricted mating following sporulation. After just ten sexual cycles, we observed evolution in growth, cell size, pheromone production, and mating, with the mating types responding asymmetrically, but little evolutionary change in sporulation rate. Mating type dimorphism increased, with evident trade-offs between growth, attractiveness, and cell size. Genome sequences from a subset of populations revealed many mutations affecting sex-related genes. Unexpectedly, when alternation of ploidy states was not enforced, the populations evolved to become sporulation-competent haploids, unlinking meiosis from ploidy change. Our results illustrate that sexual differentiation can evolve rapidly in response to an increased opportunity for sexual selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.