ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Consensus Molecular Subtypes Inform HIPEC Agent Selection in Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) added to cytoreductive surgery shows promise for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM), effectiveness remains variable. Given the predominance of consensus molecular subtype 4 (CMS4) in CRC-PM and resistance to standard agents, we hypothesized CMS4 exhibits distinct drug sensitivities. MATERIALS AND
methodsDrug sensitivity data from the DepMap PRISM Repurposing Dataset for 34 CRC cell lines were classified into the 4 CMS subtypes. Five intraperitoneal agents were analyzed: mitomycin-C, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin. Differential drug response among CMS subtypes was assessed using log2 fold change (log2FC) in cell viability.
resultsThe 34 CRC cell lines were classified into 4 categories: CMS1 (29%), CMS2 (18%), CMS3 (26%), and CMS4 (26%). CMS4 cell lines demonstrated higher sensitivity than CMS2 lines to mitomycin-C (median log2FC = -2.35 versus -0.21, p = 0.019). CMS4 and CMS3 cell lines were significantly more sensitive to irinotecan than CMS1 and CMS2 cell lines (p = 0.004). Oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin showed no differential sensitivity across subtypes. CMS4 cell lines demonstrated sensitivity (sensitivity threshold log2FC < -1.74) to mitomycin-C and irinotecan but showed lack of sensitivity to oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin.
conclusionsCMS4 exhibits distinct drug sensitivity patterns that could guide personalized HIPEC agent selection. This may explain the success of mitomycin-C and the limited efficacy of oxaliplatin in HIPEC trials. Future clinical trials should consider genomic subtyping and drug sensitivity testing to guide personalized HIPEC strategies for patients with CRC-PM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41634518What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.