ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Analysis of the clinical efficacy of robot-assisted left total knee arthroplasty performed by surgeons with varying levels of experience.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of the primary surgeon's routine surgical experience on the clinical efficacy of robot-assisted knee arthroplasty.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Comparative study on the performance and early clinical outcomes of senior and junior orthopaedic surgeons in traditional versus robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study sought to compare the clinical outcomes of left total knee arthroplasty performed under robotic assistance by right-handed surgeons of differing experience levels, and to assess how such technology may improve operative precision and mitigate experience-related variations in results. A retrospective review was performed for 120 patients suffering from left knee osteoarthritis, all of whom received total knee arthroplasty from December 2020 to June 2025. Patients were divided into Group A (senior surgeons, > 10 years of experience) and Group B (junior surgeons, < 2 years of experience), each comprising 60 patients. Each group was further subdivided into robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) and conventional total knee arthroplasty (CTKA) subgroups, with 30 patients in each. Recorded parameters included operative time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, sagittal and coronal tibial and femoral component angles (LTC, FTC, LFC, FFC), as well as Knee Society Score (KSS), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, range of motion (ROM), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores on postoperative days 3 and 90. Complication rates were also compared. The results showed that while senior surgeons had shorter operative times and better early radiographic outcomes in conventional TKA, robotic assistance significantly improved component alignment and early clinical scores for junior surgeons, resulting in no statistically significant inter-group differences. in both radiographic and clinical outcomes. Notably, in the RTKA subgroups, there were no statistically significant disparities noted in operative outcomes when comparing procedures performed by senior and junior surgeons in any intraoperative, radiographic, or clinical parameters. Additionally, junior surgeons performing conventional left TKA had a higher incidence of femoral anterior cortical notching (NOTCH). In conclusion, robot-assisted left total knee arthroplasty enhances procedural consistency and reduces the performance gap between surgeons of different experience levels, particularly aiding junior right-handed surgeons in overcoming technical challenges associated with non-dominant side surgery, thereby showing potential to promote greater consistency in surgical outcomes and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.