ArticleAMB Express2026
Microbial succession and machine learning for postmortem interval estimation in bromadiolone-poisoned cadavers.
Article in AMB Express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in forensic science: a systematic review. Part II: long-range postmortem interval estimation.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Forensic Microbiomics and Trace Microbial Evidence: Molecular Innovations for Linking Suspects, Objects, and Environments.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- From sepsis-or-artifact to court-ready microbial attribution: a global validation passport for forensic microbiology.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate estimation of the postmortem interval (PMI) remains a major challenge in forensic investigations. Although microbial succession has emerged as a promising biological clock, the impact of xenobiotic exposure on internal microbial communities during decomposition remain poorly understood. Here, we established a bromadiolone-poisoned rat model and systematically sampled gut and anus swabs at 6 h intervals over 96 h postmortem period. Bromadiolone exposure produced dose-dependent effects on decomposition, with high-doses delaying the progression, potentially by altering tissue integrity or microbial activity. 16 S rRNA sequencing revealed that Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were the dominant phyla during decomposition, followed by Bacteroidota, Desulfobacterota, and Actinobacteriota. Notably, microbial community dynamics were driven more strongly by anatomical location than by toxicant exposure, highlighting the critical role of sampling site. Furthermore, five machine-learning algorithms were evaluated for PMI prediction. GB regression outperformed RF, RR, SV, and LR, achieving an R² of 0.954 and an RMSE of 5.6 h. Feature analysis identified Proteus mirabilis and Morganella morganii as dominant positive biomarkers, while gut-associated taxa (e.g., Lactobacillus and Ligilactobacillus) declined over time. Together, these results demonstrate that bromadiolone exposure induces site-specific perturbations in microbial community, the underlying successional dynamics remain sufficiently robust to support accurate PMI estimation. The GB model provides both predictive accuracy and biological interpretability, highlighting the importance of incorporating anatomical location and toxicological stress into microbiome-based PMI estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.