Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634475›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Gratton effect in the numerical Stroop task is distance dependent.

Ido Shichel, Liat Goldfarb

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ido ShichelDepartment of Learning Disabilities, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Avenue, Mount Carmel, 3498838, Haifa, Israel. shichel003@gmail.com.
Liat GoldfarbDepartment of Learning Disabilities, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Avenue, Mount Carmel, 3498838, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the numerical Stroop task, two digits that vary in both numerical and physical size appear, and participants need to identify which digit has the larger numerical value. Typically, slower responses occur when numerical difference between the digits is small. This finding is known as the distance effect. Slower responses are also noted when numerical and physical sizes are incongruent, known as the size-congruency effect. Additionally, at larger distances, the interfering dimension affects performance less. Furthermore, the size-congruency effect is diminished when the previous trial is incongruent rather than congruent, known as the Gratton effect. The Gratton effect can be explained by several theories, some of which relate to the notion of cognitive control. Based on this idea, the current study investigated whether manipulating task targets through the distance between the numbers influences the appearance of the adaptive control effect, as reflected in the Gratton effect. It examines if the distance in the current trial affects the appearance of the Gratton effect. Both Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 showed that in different settings of the numerical Stroop task, numerical distance influenced the appearance of the Gratton effect, with a more pronounced Gratton effect observed for smaller distances compared with larger ones. This suggests that affecting the task's targets when comparing the two numbers, as indicated by numerical distance, impacted the effect of previous conflicts, with this effect decreasing as comparing the two numbers became easier. These findings are further discussed in the context of cognitive control and numerical processing.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionMathematical ConceptsPattern Recognition, VisualPsychomotor PerformanceStroop TestAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCognitive controlDistance effectGratton effectNumerical Stroop taskSize-Congruency effect

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.