Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634474›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Differential effects of contextual congruency on recognition and retrieval of perceptual details.

Rebeca Suárez, Bruno Lara, Alejandra Ciria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebeca SuárezFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Bruno LaraCentro de Investigación en Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Alejandra CiriaInstituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y en Sistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México. alejandra.ciria@unam.mx.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction errors arising from contextual violations play a fundamental role in learning and memory, yet their effects remain controversial. While some research suggests prediction errors enhance memory for incongruent information, other evidence shows that schema-congruent events are better remembered. This study investigates how contextual congruency during encoding affects both recognition memory and retrieval of fine-grained perceptual details. Using object-scene pairings, we examined whether predictions based on memory schemas differentially influence the encoding of congruent versus incongruent information. The Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST) was adapted to incorporate naturalistic scene contexts. Participants viewed indoor scenes with contextually congruent or incongruent objects during encoding, then classified single objects as "old" (previously encountered at the encoding phase), "similar" (objects perceptually similar to previously encountered), or "new". Memory was assessed using the Corrected Recognition score (REC) for recognition accuracy, the Lure Discrimination Index (LDI) for fine-grained perceptual detail retrieval and discrimination, and the Rate of Correct Scores (RCS) for processing efficiency. Contextually congruent objects yielded significantly higher recognition accuracy and processing efficiency compared to incongruent objects. However, no congruency advantage was found for the retrieval of fine-grained perceptual details, with equivalent performance across conditions. These findings suggest that predictions based on memory schemas enhance encoding and retrieval of general item information, facilitating recognition and reducing cognitive demands. In contrast, encoding of fine-grained perceptual details appears unaffected by contextual congruency. These differential effects between recognition and retrieval of perceptual details offer important insights into how predictions influence distinct aspects of memory encoding.

Indexed as

Mental RecallPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultContextual congruencyMemory schemasPredictionRecognitionRetrieval

Identifiers

PMID41634474
PMCPMC13407588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.