ArticleJournal of anesthesia2026
Success rate and efficacy of intentional ipsilateral epidural catheter placement for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a retrospective analysis of 307 consecutive patients.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reply to comments on "Success rate and efficacy of intentional ipsilateral epidural catheter placement for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery".Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Comments on 'Success rate and efficacy of intentional ipsilateral epidural catheter placement for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a retrospective analysis of 307 consecutive patients' by Aoyama et al.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntentional placement of an epidural catheter toward the operative side can produce a predominantly ipsilateral effect, which may benefit patients undergoing unilateral knee surgery. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the success rate and efficacy of intentional ipsilateral epidural catheter placement in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
methodsWith IRB approval, we retrospectively analyzed existing clinical data that had been routinely collected from patients who underwent ACLR and received intentional ipsilateral epidural catheter placement combined with spinal anesthesia between January 2021 and December 2023. All epidural catheters were advanced toward the operative side and used for continuous infusion for 3 days. Catheter tip position was evaluated by X-ray on postoperative day (POD) 1. Pain scores on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), analgesic requirements, distribution of sensory blockade, motor function, and complications through POD4 were evaluated.
resultsOf 307 patients undergoing ACLR, 297 patients were included in the analysis. Catheters were inserted between the T11/12 and L1/2 intervertebral spaces. X-rays revealed that the epidural catheter tip was located on the operated side in 274 patients (92.3%). An ipsilateral-dominant sensory block covering lumbar segments was observed in more than 90% of patients throughout 3 PODs. Median NRS scores during mobilization remained below 3 with epidural infusion, and 263 patients (88.6%) could perform active straight leg raise on the operative side on POD1.
conclusionIntentional ipsilateral epidural catheter placement demonstrated a high success rate, provided motor-sparing and satisfactory analgesia in patients undergoing ACLR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41634452What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.