Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634433›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026

Tailoring targeted therapies for younger women with ER-positive early-stage breast cancer.

Soraia Lobo-Martins, Stephen J Luen, Martine Piccart, Sherene Loi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Soraia Lobo-Martins *Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Institut Jules Bordet, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5847-7192
Stephen J Luen *Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6962-2906
Martine PiccartHôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Institut Jules Bordet, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium. martine.piccart@hubruxelles.be.
Sherene LoiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. sherene.loi@petermac.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6137-9171

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Younger premenopausal women (typically defined as those aged <40 years) diagnosed with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive early-stage breast cancer have disproportionately poorer outcomes relative to older women, with age-related differences being especially pronounced in this subtype. Emerging evidence suggests that this age-related disparity is underpinned by distinct biological and genomic features - such as enrichment in copy number alterations, homologous recombination deficiency and unique immune microenvironments - that are not fully addressed by current therapeutic strategies. Endocrine therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for premenopausal women with ER-positive early-stage breast cancer, yet strategies for its use continue to evolve. Clinical studies have highlighted the importance of ovarian function suppression (OFS) in improving the outcomes in patients with high-risk disease, as well as the benefit of adding CDK4/6 inhibitors to standard-of-care (SOC) endocrine therapies and the expanding role of molecular profiling in guiding treatment decisions. In this Review, we describe how treatment paradigms are now challenging the conventional sequencing of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in younger women. A biology-driven approach - incorporating germline status, gene expression and immune signatures - will better guide therapy in this population and transform clinical decision-making beyond chronological age. We propose that future trials involving women with premenopausal ER-positive disease must prioritize biology over age in defining eligibility, incorporate OFS as a SOC in the control arm and expand biomarker-driven approaches to refine both treatment escalation and de-escalation. A genomically and immunologically informed strategy is essential to improve the outcomes in this under-represented population.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMolecular Targeted TherapyReceptors, EstrogenAdultAge FactorsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalFemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingPremenopauseAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.