Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634405›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026

Diagnostic practice and awareness of SDH- and FH-deficient renal cell carcinoma: results from an Italian Study Group of uropathology (GIUP) survey.

Giuseppe Nicolò Fanelli, Anna Caliò, Stefano Marletta, Maria Ballotta, Marco Barella, Guido Bellezza, Paola Bianco, Angelo Giovanni Bonadio, Piergiuseppe Colombo, Alessandro D'Amuri and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Giuseppe Nicolò Fanelli *Division of Pathology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7069-7980
Anna Caliò *Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-6327
Stefano MarlettaDivision of Pathology, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, Catania, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7881-8767
Maria BallottaPathology Unit, AULSS 5 Polesana, S. Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
Marco BarellaPathology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8559-9101
Guido BellezzaPathology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6337-1701
Paola BiancoPathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1365-6995
Angelo Giovanni BonadioPathology Unit, S. Giacomo Hospital, Novi Ligure, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6050-3222
Piergiuseppe ColomboDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6161-6138
Alessandro D'AmuriPathology Unit, "Vito Fazzi" Hospital, Lecce, Italy.
Giovanni De ChiaraPathology Unit, A.O.R.N. "San Giuseppe Moscati", Avellino, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0894-8544
Veronica ErrigoPathology Unit, Department of Pathology, San Paolo Hospital - ASL2 Liguria, Savona, Italy.
Denise FioriniPathology Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Francesca FranziPathology and Histology Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Circolo and Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy.
Daniele LisciaPathology Unit, Biella Hospital, ASL Biella, Biella, Italy.
Lisa MarcoliniPathology Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Daniela OnnisPathology Unit, ARNAS "G. Brotzu", Cagliari, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9590-2351
Francesca PagliucaPathology Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Antonio Paniccià BonifaziPathology Unit, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy.
Francesco PiercontiInstitute of Pathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS and Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0951-4131
Barbara PozziPathology Unit, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy.
Lavinia StefanizziPathology Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Marina ValeriPathology Unit, ASST Bergamo Est - Bolognini Hospital, Seriate, Bergamo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9998-8762
Mariavittoria VescovoPathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6959-3252
Guido MartignoniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. guido.martignoni@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7761-7274

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic renal cell carcinomas (RCC) deficient in succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) or fumarate hydratase (FH) are rare but clinically significant entities formalized in the last WHO classification. Their recognition typically starts from morphology and is corroborated by targeted immunohistochemistry (IHC) and, where appropriate, molecular and germline testing. In routine practice, however, implementation may be uneven. Hence, we conducted a nationwide, web-based survey (made by 25 items) among members of the Italian Study Group of Uropathology (GIUP) to map real-world awareness, diagnostic pathways, and test availability across Italian centers. Twenty-one pathologists responded; 18/21 (85.7%) reported dedicated uropathology practice with heterogeneous seniority (≤ 5 years, 28.6%; 5-10 years, 19.0%; 10-20 years, 14.3%; > 20 years, 38.1%). Despite substantial renal-tumor workloads (12/20, 57.1% handled > 100 cases in the previous 5 years), direct exposure to metabolic RCCs remained limited (FH-deficient ≥ 1 case, 11/21, 52.4%; SDH-deficient ≥ 1 case, 9/21, 42.9%). Suspicion was predominantly morphology-led: for SDH-deficient RCC, morphology ranked first in 16/21 (76.2%) with the commonest sequence morphology > age > number of lesions (76.2%); for FH-deficient RCC, morphology was top-ranked in 19/21 (90.5%). Key morphologic cues were mixed architectural patterns/papillary elements/macronucleoli for FH-deficient RCC, and eosinophilic cytoplasm with solid-alveolar architecture for SDH-deficient RCC. IHC mirrored these priorities (FH top for FH-deficient, 85.7%; SDHB top for SDH-deficient, 76.2%), whereas 2-succinocysteine (2SC) was rarely available (1/21, 4.8%). Critically, this FH-loss-only workflow can miss non-truncating FH variants (FH immunoreactive but enzymatically inactive) tumors, contributing to under-recognition. Molecular testing would be requested in all suspected cases by 12/21 (57.1%); among selective users, equivocal IHC was the leading trigger (6/8, 75%). Overall, metabolic RCC recognition in Italy is primarily morphology-driven but constrained by uneven access to confirmatory IHC, particularly 2SC, and to molecular assays. The findings argue for harmonized diagnostic algorithms, regional reference laboratory networks, and routine involvement of molecular tumor boards, supported by targeted educational initiatives (including curated digital slide repositories), to standardize practice and improve patient pathways from morphologic suspicion to genetic counselling and tailored surveillance.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellFumarate HydrataseKidney NeoplasmsSuccinate DehydrogenaseHumansImmunohistochemistryItalySurveys and QuestionnairesBiomarkers, TumorFumarate HydrataseSuccinate DehydrogenaseFH-deficient RCCHereditary renal cancerSDH-deficient RCC

Identifiers

PMID41634405
PMCPMC13582032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.