ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Diagnostic practice and awareness of SDH- and FH-deficient renal cell carcinoma: results from an Italian Study Group of uropathology (GIUP) survey.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immunohistochemical Surrogates for Molecularly Defined Renal Tumors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic renal cell carcinomas (RCC) deficient in succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) or fumarate hydratase (FH) are rare but clinically significant entities formalized in the last WHO classification. Their recognition typically starts from morphology and is corroborated by targeted immunohistochemistry (IHC) and, where appropriate, molecular and germline testing. In routine practice, however, implementation may be uneven. Hence, we conducted a nationwide, web-based survey (made by 25 items) among members of the Italian Study Group of Uropathology (GIUP) to map real-world awareness, diagnostic pathways, and test availability across Italian centers. Twenty-one pathologists responded; 18/21 (85.7%) reported dedicated uropathology practice with heterogeneous seniority (≤ 5 years, 28.6%; 5-10 years, 19.0%; 10-20 years, 14.3%; > 20 years, 38.1%). Despite substantial renal-tumor workloads (12/20, 57.1% handled > 100 cases in the previous 5 years), direct exposure to metabolic RCCs remained limited (FH-deficient ≥ 1 case, 11/21, 52.4%; SDH-deficient ≥ 1 case, 9/21, 42.9%). Suspicion was predominantly morphology-led: for SDH-deficient RCC, morphology ranked first in 16/21 (76.2%) with the commonest sequence morphology > age > number of lesions (76.2%); for FH-deficient RCC, morphology was top-ranked in 19/21 (90.5%). Key morphologic cues were mixed architectural patterns/papillary elements/macronucleoli for FH-deficient RCC, and eosinophilic cytoplasm with solid-alveolar architecture for SDH-deficient RCC. IHC mirrored these priorities (FH top for FH-deficient, 85.7%; SDHB top for SDH-deficient, 76.2%), whereas 2-succinocysteine (2SC) was rarely available (1/21, 4.8%). Critically, this FH-loss-only workflow can miss non-truncating FH variants (FH immunoreactive but enzymatically inactive) tumors, contributing to under-recognition. Molecular testing would be requested in all suspected cases by 12/21 (57.1%); among selective users, equivocal IHC was the leading trigger (6/8, 75%). Overall, metabolic RCC recognition in Italy is primarily morphology-driven but constrained by uneven access to confirmatory IHC, particularly 2SC, and to molecular assays. The findings argue for harmonized diagnostic algorithms, regional reference laboratory networks, and routine involvement of molecular tumor boards, supported by targeted educational initiatives (including curated digital slide repositories), to standardize practice and improve patient pathways from morphologic suspicion to genetic counselling and tailored surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.