ArticleAnnals of hematology2026
Elevated circulating CD10
Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New Insights Into the Role of Neutrophils in Lymphoma.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accumulating evidence has revealed that myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) play a pivotal role in the poor prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The immunophenotypic profile of G-MDSCs is more complex and remains to be fully clarified. Our preliminary studies have discovered a novel population of CD10−negative neutrophils characterized by an immature phenotype and immunosuppressive properties, closely resembling those of G-MDSCs (named as CD10−G-MDSCs). Here, we investigated the expression profiles and disease relevance of CD10−G-MDSCs in DLBCL patients. The proportion of CD10−G-MDSCs in peripheral blood was prospectively analyzed by flow cytometry in 150 DLBCL patients and 40 healthy donors (HDs). Additionally, cytokine levels were measured in serum samples in 39 DLBCL patients. The levels of CD10−G-MDSCs were elevated in all DLBCL subgroups. Furthermore, the levels were particularly higher in the newly diagnosed (ND) and relapsed/refractory group compared to those in the remission group. In DLBCL-ND group, CD10−G-MDSCs expansion was closely associated with advanced stage, extranodal involvement, bulky mass, elevated LDH levels and double expression. Stratification by the median value (11.13%) showed that higher CD10−G-MDSCs levels were associated with poorer treatment response, progression-free survival and overall survival. CD10−G-MDSCs levels also were correlated positively with serum IL-6 and IL-17. Elevated circulating CD10−G-MDSCs were associated with adverse clinical features and poor outcomes in DLBCL. These findings suggest that CD10−G-MDSCs may serve as an adjunct marker for risk assessment. The correlation with pro-inflammatory cytokines raises the possibility of immunological involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.