ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
Navigating the United States FDA advisory: Probiotics in Preterm Infants.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PROTECT-Preterm: emulating target trials of dynamic probiotic strategies for necrotising enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis and mortality in very preterm infants - a study protocol.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Current Evidence, Controversies, and the Future of Biotics in the Prevention of Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a severe gastrointestinal emergency in preterm infants, leading to high mortality and long-term complications. Probiotics have been extensively studied and shown in multiple randomized trials and meta-analyses to significantly reduce the incidence of severe NEC, all-cause mortality, and late-onset sepsis. Despite strong evidence and international guidelines supporting their use, probiotic administration in US neonatal intensive care units has sharply declined following a 2023 FDA advisory. The FDA cited safety concerns, lack of product quality control, and the unapproved drug status of probiotics as reasons for this warning. This paper reviews the compelling evidence for probiotic efficacy, examines the FDA's rationale, and contrasts US policy with global practices. It highlights the risk-benefit imbalance of withholding probiotics, analyzes the resulting clinical dilemma, and proposes a path forward through regulatory reform, ongoing research, and stakeholder collaboration to ensure access to this potentially life-saving intervention for preterm infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41634356What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.