ArticleScientific reports2026
Audience segmentation and messaging approach to gain public support and involvement in coastal social-ecological system management.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gaining public support and involvement is essential for implementing effective social-ecological system (SES) management. Earlier studies focused on an aggregate level, i.e., measured by average; however, we aimed to address public heterogeneity, determine their support for policy, and identify their involvement in SES management. Accordingly, we applied audience segmentation and a messaging approach in coastal SES management to address oligotrophication in part of the Seto Inland Sea (SIS), Japan. In our experimental study, audience segmentation was applied based on a single-item self-categorization measure regarding public opinion about coastal SES issues and management, and the impact of two messaging conditions on the segments was assessed. Respondents living in coastal SES areas were recruited (N = 1800) and randomly divided into three groups: a control group without messaging and two groups with either "Negative consequences of oligotrophication" or "Collective public involvement" messaging. Four primary segments were identified: alarmed, concerned, cautious, and disengaged-dismissive. The groups exhibited distinctive personal characteristics and decreasing levels of policy support and involvement. For example, those in segment "Disengaged- Dismissive" were generally younger and physically and psychologically distant from the sea, showed less recognition of the problems, and exhibited infrequent related behaviors (e.g., consuming local seafood), with lower values of the sea. Such knowledge informs policymakers in targeting decisions. The two messaging conditions comprised varied impacts on different segments, suggesting that policymakers should select messaging conditions based on the target segment. Our study highlighted the importance of audience segmentation and targeted messaging in enabling policymakers to effectively reach the public sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.