ArticleScientific reports2026
Estimating chemical oxygen demand in municipal landfill leachate using multilayer perceptron artificial neural networks based on seasonal monitoring data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Landfill leachate is a hazardous by-product of municipal solid waste (MSW) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) is a key indicator for evaluating its pollution strength and treatment needs. This study aimed to predict leachate COD concentrations from the Nigde Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site using a Multilayer Perceptron Artificial Neural Network (MLPANN). 52 weekly leachate samples were collected and analyzed for physicochemical indicators, including pH, the ambient temperature, total solids (TS), oil and grease (OG), electrical conductivity (EC), arsenic (As), cobalt (Co), and cadmium (Cd). The principal component analysis (PCA) identified three significant components that explained 77.84% of the total variance. pH, temperature, Cd, Co, and OG had significant loading scores among other parameters. Four models were tested with different input selections. Before running the models, the data set (n = 52) was split with season strata to 70% as the training set and 30% as the testing set. After cross-validation, the best model was selected based on the lowest error metrics. The best-performing model, which incorporated variables selected via PCA performed the best during cross-validation and generalization. Its final architecture (5-21-1) was used for the testing set and achieved a correlation coefficient of 0.864. This study also represents the first application of the brulee engine within the tidymodels framework for leachate COD prediction, offering a reproducible modeling approach for environmental monitoring studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.