ArticleSpinal cord2026
Evaluating and refining the wheelchair mobility activity log (WC-MAL): a comprehensive study of validity and reliability.
Article in Spinal cord, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designValidity and Reliability Analysis.
objectiveEvaluate the structural validity, reliability and criterion validity of the Wheelchair Mobility Activity Log (WC-MAL) using Rasch analysis.
methodsSixty individuals with SCI and using a manual wheelchair participated in the study. The WC-MAL was employed remotely. Rasch analysis evaluated the structural validity of the instrument. The intra-rater reliability of the WC-MAL score was analysed using the random model Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and the Standard Error of Measurement was calculated to estimate the precision of individual scores. For concurrent criterion validity, the data from the tachometer were used as the "gold standard" to assess wheelchair mobility, with the WC-MAL serving as the comparator. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between the tachometer data and WC-MAL Frequency Scale scores.
resultsThe Rasch analysis led to the exclusion of three items (1, 3, and 10) from the original instrument, improving model fit and refining WC-MAL 2.0. WC-MAL 2.0 demonstrated good discriminant ability with a Person Separation Reliability of 0.91-0.93 and explained variance between 59.3 and 61%. The WC-MAL 2.0 showed no local dependency, maintained unidimensionality across all scales, and exhibited no uniform Differential Item Functioning. The WC-MAL 2.0 demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC0.84-0.91), strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.84-0.91), and strong correlations between the Frequency Scale and tachometer data (r = 0.78, p < 0.001), supporting its criterion validity.
conclusionThe WC-MAL 2.0 is a suitable instrument with adequate validity and reliability for assessing wheelchair performance in individuals with SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.