ArticleScientific reports2026
Research on factors affecting sustainable development in ecologically fragile areas based on a social-ecological system framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since modern rural development results from a complex interaction between various exogenous forces, the sustainable development of rural communities in ecologically fragile areas is inherently a systemic endeavor. This study, guided by the social-ecological system theory, examines the impact of social, economic, political, natural, and other external factors on the sustainable development of rural communities in these areas. The goal is to gain a deeper understanding of the underlying causes of delayed development in these communities. The results are as follows: First, labor outflow, ecological fragility, and informal institutions significantly hinder the sustainable development of rural communities, while regional economic development demonstrates a strong positive relationship with the sustainability of rural communities. Second, regional economic development primarily influences the sustainability of communities through its impact on locational conditions. Communities closer to the county and town experience a more pronounced positive effect from regional economic development. Thirdly, informal institutions inhibit the sustainable development of rural communities by obstructing the land rights reform process. Finally, for small-scale communities, the inhibitory effect of ecological fragility and the facilitating effects of regional economic development are more substantial, while labor outflow and informal institutions exert a pronounced inhibitory effect primarily on large-scale communities. For low-poverty communities, labor outflow exerts a more significant inhibitory effect on community sustainability. In contrast, for high-poverty communities, the regional economic development contributes more significantly to sustainability, while ecological fragility and informal institutions have a stronger inhibitory effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.