ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning models powered by emergency medical services data enhance stroke triage in prehospital settings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Minimum Dataset for a Prehospital Stroke Emergency Dashboard.Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2026Article
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care: A Narrative Review.Missouri medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timely stroke diagnosis is essential for delivering life-saving treatments, yet current prehospital stroke assessment tools often lead to missed or delayed diagnoses. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) increasingly collect detailed data during transport, offering an opportunity to develop AI-based tools to support early stroke detection. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the availability and reliability of prehospital data compared to Emergency Department (ED) records. We tested the potential of machine learning to support EMS stroke triage. Our cohort included 4,333 patients across 8,221 ambulance encounters from 2015 to 2020 with stroke rate of 2.0% (64% severe strokes). Vital signs such as heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and GCS scores, recorded in over 88%, were generally higher than their ED counterparts. We trained and evaluated random forest, XGBoost, and sequential neural networks for detecting stroke and severe stroke. The XGBoost model performed best for stroke detection (ROC-AUC 0.843 [0.77–0.89], PR-AUC 0.293 [0.16–0.45]), while Random Forest performed best for severe strokes (ROC-AUC 0.826 [0.75–0.90], PR-AUC 0.186 [0.07–0.35]). Models were calibrated to improve reliability, and feature importance was assessed using SHAP to enhance interpretability. These findings highlight the promise of AI-based tools in improving prehospital stroke triage with real-time EMS data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.