ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2026
Accuracy of CAD/CAM planned mandibular reconstruction with scapula free flaps in reconstructive head and neck surgery - A single center study.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing and mixed reality technologies in a novel mandibular reconstruction plate system.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Posterior airway space following mandibular reconstruction using microvascular free flaps in oral cancer patients in relation to radiotherapy: a single-center study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFor the first time, this study explores the transfer precision of computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in mandibular reconstruction with scapula free flaps (SFF).
methodsPatients undergoing mandibular reconstruction with SFF and patient-specific 3D-printed titanium plates were retrospectively analyzed. To assess planning accuracy, pre- and postoperative datasets were overlaid using 3D Slicer software. Specific measurements included the fit at the mandibular resection site, intersegmental gap width between scapula and mandible, scapular segment positioning, and condylar alignment. Osseous union was evaluated via postoperative computed tomography (CT) or cone beam CT, and plate-related complications were recorded clinically.
resultsIn total 15 patients (mean age 65.7 ± 10.0 years) were included. Postoperative scapular segment positioning showed deviations in the posterior region (basal: 6.78 ± 3.34 mm; crestal: 7.61 ± 3.40 mm) and anterior region (basal: 3.54 ± 1.52 mm; crestal: 4.49 ± 2.51 mm). Mean deviation in segmental gap width at the anterior and posterior sites ranged from 0.55 to 1.72 mm and was statistically significant at all four measurements. Mean contralateral condyle position differed significantly from the initial position (8.56 ± 4.31 mm). Intraoral plate exposure occurred in three patients without adjuvant radiotherapy; no extraoral exposure, fractures, or loosening were observed. Non-union between the mandible and SFF was found in three patients.
conclusionAs with other CAD/CAM-assisted mandibular reconstructions, SFF exhibit discrepancies between virtual planning and the postoperative outcome. The surrounding soft tissue bulk of the scapula can hinder the precise fit of cutting guides, potentially compromising reconstruction accuracy and contributing to increased deviations. Despite these challenges, CAD/CAM-assisted SFF demonstrates acceptable surgical predictability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.