ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Left atrial appendage closure after a hospital admission for bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients: frequency, associated factors and prognosis.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances of Fully Biodegradable Poly-p-Dioxanone and Polylactic Acid-Based Polymers as Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices.Macromolecular bioscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are no "real world" data on the actual impact of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) programs in the management of anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after a hospital admission for bleeding. Our aim was to investigate the frequency, associated factors and prognostic impact of LAAC in the management of this population. All anticoagulated AF patients discharged alive from January 2021 to December 2022 after an intracranial or gastrointestinal haemorrhage, in the 15 public hospitals with LAAC program in Andalusia (South of Spain) were included in the study. Frequency, associated factors and prognostic impact of LAAC were investigated. Among a population of 7.119.044 inhabitants, 1403 patients were included (median age 81[p25-75, 76-87] years, 51.6% male). A LAAC procedure was performed in 114 patients (8.13%, 95%CI 6.70-9.56%) at 5 [2-10] months after discharge. LAAC was independently associated with tertiary referral centre, intracranial haemorrhage, previous bleeding, valvular heart disease, leukaemia and aspirin use while it was more infrequent in aged > 80 years, dementia, uncontrolled hypertension, vitamin K antagonist use and interventional treatment of the bleeding event (p < 0.05). After the procedure, the LAAC group had a better survival free from embolic/bleeding events and all-cause death (66% versus 49%) and overall survival (82% versus 64%) at 24 months (p < 0.05), consistent after multivariate adjustment: HR 0.65[0.46-0.92] and HR 0.52[0.32-0.86], respectively (p < 0.05). In our study, LAAC was infrequently performed after a severe bleeding in anticoagulated AF patients, although it was associated with better prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41634269What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.