ArticleScience China. Life sciences2026
Unveiling animal death cognition: the role of social systems.
Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As studies aimed at clarifying the evolution of cognition in animals accumulate, some non-human primates are widely considered to be the most cognitively advanced species after humans. Cognitive processes related to social interaction and emotional responsiveness may also play a role in primates' responses to death and dying; however, how social complexity might influence animals' understanding of death remains under-explored. Here, we connect evolutionary development and social systems to death cognition, and establish a five-dimensional framework for comparative purposes, based on existing thanatological studies. Of 135 species included in the analysis, dolphins, elephants and chimpanzees-species with highly complex societies-were shown to have a more advanced death understanding than other taxonomically close species. Focusing on a multilevel society primate, the golden snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana), we present five death-related case studies involving behavioral, physiological, and social responses to dead conspecifics. Despite evolving on an older phylogenetic branch than that leading to modern hominids, these monkeys display prolonged dead-infant carrying, care/caretaking, silence and compassion, and revisitation of corpses at levels comparable to those seen in chimpanzees, more than other, non-multilevel society primates. In addition to introducing a novel approach to the comparative and evolutionary study of death-related behavior, we suggest that social complexity can exert a modulatory influence on phylogenetic factors that constrain the baseline cognitive architecture, allowing more nuanced expressions of death cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41634256What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.