Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634253›Full record

ArticleScience China. Life sciences2026

Comprehensive phylogenomic analyses of ciliated protists with a revised classification of the phylum Ciliophora (Eukaryota, Alveolata).

Yurui Wang, Ying Yan, Zhenzhen Yi, Yan Zhao, Qianqian Zhang, Yong Chi, Tengyue Zhang, Weiwei Liu, Mingjian Liu, Borong Lu and 13 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Yurui Wang *Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolution of Protozoa in Wetland, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710119, China.
Ying Yan *Key Laboratory of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity (Ministry of Education), and Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Zhenzhen YiSchool of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China.
Yan ZhaoCollege of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China.
Qianqian ZhangYantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, 264003, China.
Yong ChiKey Laboratory of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity (Ministry of Education), and Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Tengyue ZhangCollege of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002, China.
Weiwei LiuSouth China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510301, China.
Mingjian LiuKey Laboratory of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity (Ministry of Education), and Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Borong LuKey Laboratory of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity (Ministry of Education), and Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Mingzhen MaKey Laboratory of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity (Ministry of Education), and Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Wenbao ZhuangKey Laboratory of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity (Ministry of Education), and Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Liping LyuKey Laboratory of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity (Ministry of Education), and Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Gongaote ZhangKey Laboratory of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity (Ministry of Education), and Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Chao LiKey Laboratory of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity (Ministry of Education), and Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Zhaorui ZhouKey Laboratory of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity (Ministry of Education), and Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Yuanning LiInstitute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, China.
Chen ShaoLaboratory of Biodiversity and Evolution of Protozoa in Wetland, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710119, China.
Alan WarrenDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK.
Shahed U A ShazibDepartment of Biological Sciences, Smith College, Northampton, 01063, USA.
Weibo SongKey Laboratory of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity (Ministry of Education), and Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Laura A KatzDepartment of Biological Sciences, Smith College, Northampton, 01063, USA. lkatz@smith.edu.
Feng GaoKey Laboratory of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity (Ministry of Education), and Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China. gaof@ouc.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenomic analyses are instrumental in enhancing our comprehension of evolutionary relationships across the tree of life. Among eukaryotes, ciliates are one of the most diverse groups of single-cell eukaryotes that play important roles in microbial food webs and have been used as important model organisms in a wide range of studies. However, evolutionary relationships within ciliates remain contentious due to low resolution of limited molecular markers and/or limited taxa. To provide a more comprehensive understanding of the evolutionary relationships within the clade Ciliophora, we sequenced the genomes and/or transcriptomes of 52 ciliate species from 10 classes. Combining analyses of these with publicly available data, we generated a dataset that comprises 190 ciliate species spanning 49 orders, encompassing 16 of the 17 recognized classes within the phylum Ciliophora, thereby achieving nearly complete class-level representation of this diverse group. Among these species, 74 were analyzed for the first time from a phylogenomic perspective. We provided an updated classification of Ciliophora, comprising the class Mesodiniea and two major clades, i.e., Postciliodesmatophora and Intramacronucleata, with Intramacronucleata comprising two main clades (CONthreeP and SLAOMP) and Protocruziea. We also evaluated the effect of missing data and provided datasets-a 200 core-gene family list and multiple sequence alignments-to facilitate future phylogenomic analyses. Furthermore, based on the highly reliable phylogenomic tree, we estimated that the phylum Ciliophora originated approximately 1,052 million years ago (Mya) at the beginning of the Meso-proterozoic period. The robust phylogenomic framework presented here not only facilitates a deeper exploration of ciliate evolution but also provides a reference for future phylogenetic and taxonomic studies.

Indexed as

CiliophoraPhylogenyEvolution, MolecularGenome, ProtozoanGenomicsTranscriptomeCiliophoracore-genedivergence timegenomephylogenomicstranscriptome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.