Article3D printing in medicine2026
3D printing enabled biomechanical evaluation of a novel expandable wedge spacer for atlantoaxial reduction.
Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) is a severe instability of the craniovertebral junction that may cause progressive spinal cord compression and neurological impairment. Achieving complete reduction remains challenging when anterior inclination deformity of the atlas limits posterior traction. This study introduces a novel titanium alloy expandable wedge-shaped spacer designed to correct the anterior inclination of the atlantoaxial joint (AAJ) and facilitate controlled distraction and reduction. The implant integrates a two-stage expansion mechanism that enables sequential anterior elevation and fixation stability. To overcome the scarcity of cadaveric specimens, a patient-specific 3D-printed C1–C2 model was reconstructed from clinical CT data to replicate pathological morphology, simulate ligament behavior, and provide a reproducible biomechanical testing platform. Static and fatigue compression tests, performed according to ASTM F2077 and ISO 23089-2, demonstrated superior load-bearing strength (6725 ± 123 N) and long-term durability over 5 million cycles at 1650 N, with an expansion torque of only 52.56 ± 7.54 N·mm. Reduction experiments using the 3D-printed platform showed that the spacer decreased the required traction force by approximately 70% and redirected the reduction trajectory toward the physiological axis. The integration of medical imaging and high-resolution 3D printing enabled precise replication of patient-specific anatomy and standardized mechanical evaluation that is otherwise unachievable with cadaveric models. This study highlights how 3D printing enables patient-specific modeling, quantitative validation, and iterative optimization of implant design—illustrating its critical role in bridging preclinical testing and clinical translation for complex spinal applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.