Co-designing a new clinical pathway to support families with children identified as having early-stage type 1 diabetes in Western Australia.

aims/hypothesisChildren with early-stage (pre-symptomatic) type 1 diabetes are currently identified primarily via research-based screening programmes in Australia. Once identified, families live with the knowledge that their child has an increased chance of developing symptomatic, lifelong, insulin-requiring type 1 diabetes but have no specific clinical pathway available to them in Western Australia (WA) for accessing tailored support or education. This project aimed to co-design a new clinical pathway to address this unmet need.

methodsExperience-based co-design (EBCD) methodology was applied, comprising three phases undertaken consecutively over 12 months. Recruitment for each phase was via open invitation with voluntary participation. Phases 1 and 2 involved facilitated community conversations and focus groups conducted separately for type 1 diabetes community members and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Data from these phases were analysed using deductive and inductive content analysis to identify key categories of information and a prototype clinical pathway was developed incorporating these. For phase 3, a combined workshop was held with all stakeholders to obtain feedback on the prototype, and refine it accordingly.

resultsIn phase 1, 16 community members (people living with type 1 diabetes, families whose child or children had been screened for type 1 diabetes) and 36 HCPs (doctors, nurse educators, social workers, dietitians, a mental health nurse and administrative staff from Perth Children's Hospital) participated in separate community conversations. The following three key categories were identified: (1) the need for education; (2) the need for support and strategies for managing uncertainty; and (3) the need for information on disease-modifying therapies and access to clinical trials. In phase 2, seven community members and 11 HCPs participated in separate focus groups. The following key priorities were identified: (1) the need for access to HCPs skilled in supporting patients to manage uncertainty; (2) the need for flexibility in delivery modes (telehealth/in-person); (3) the need for early referral to relevant clinical trials; and (4) the need for reliable and up-to-date resources. In phase 3, three community members and three HCPs attended a combined workshop to provide feedback on a prototype clinical pathway and their feedback was incorporated into a final version. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationApplication of EBCD methodology enabled the development of a new clinical pathway tailored to the needs of WA families with a child living with early-stage type 1 diabetes.