Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634172›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2026

General data protection regulation: an algorithmic proposal for forensic photography.

Mariana Cura, Ricardo Loureiro, Pedro Marcelino, Vanessa Rodrigues, José Paulo Andrade

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariana CuraInstituto Nacional de Medicina Legal e Ciências Forenses - Delegação do Sul, Rua Manuel Bento de Sousa 3, Lisboa, 1169-201, Portugal. mariana.a.cura@inmlcf.mj.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6360-0324
Ricardo LoureiroIndependent Researcher, Largo do Souto 46, Custoias, 4460-670, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5376-3116
Pedro MarcelinoInstituto Nacional de Medicina Legal e Ciências Forenses - Delegação do Sul, Rua Manuel Bento de Sousa 3, Lisboa, 1169-201, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9151-3591
Vanessa RodriguesInstituto Nacional de Medicina Legal e Ciências Forenses - Delegação do Sul, Rua Manuel Bento de Sousa 3, Lisboa, 1169-201, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7417-6779
José Paulo AndradeCintesis@Rise Unit of Anatomy, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, 4200-450, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2585-200X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has regulated personal data within the scope of the European Union. With the exponential technological advancements in mobile photography, it is crucial to expose forensic professionals to this body of law to maintain good practices for fieldwork and scientific research in this field. GDPR, as far as its application in forensic photography, can be broken down into four pillars: informed consent of the subject, acceptable image capture practices (data), data storage and security at rest, and data transfers and security in transit. All these pillars have different approaches currently in use by forensic professionals. However, only some of them are permitted under the law. We present the appropriate ways to proceed with smartphone photography while remaining in compliance and maintaining the ability to share data critical to fieldwork and scientific research. In addition, some of the common pitfalls are described. An algorithm is proposed to facilitate compliance with European regulations relating to personal data, as applied to mobile forensic photography. The same flow chart can be used in other countries with different regulations concerning health data, privacy, and security issues.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer SecurityConfidentialityForensic SciencesPhotographyEuropean UnionHumansInformed ConsentSmartphoneData securityForensic photographyInformed consentPhotographyPrivacySmartphones

Identifiers

PMID41634172
PMCPMC13161240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.