Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634146›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2026

INFOGEST Quant: standardized in vitro determination of digestibility and DIAAS of dietary proteins based on the INFOGEST static digestion model.

Lotti Egger, Ana Blanco-Doval, Raquel Sousa, Cédric Brügger, Eliane Binz, André Brodkorb, Didier Dupont, Isidra Recio, Reto Portmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. ImprovingJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lotti Egger *Agroscope, Competence Division Methods Development and Analytics, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6501-5703
Ana Blanco-Doval *Agroscope, Competence Division Methods Development and Analytics, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8754-8578
Raquel SousaAgroscope, Competence Division Methods Development and Analytics, Bern, Switzerland.
Cédric BrüggerAgroscope, Competence Division Methods Development and Analytics, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6206-6185
Eliane BinzAgroscope, Competence Division Methods Development and Analytics, Bern, Switzerland.
André BrodkorbTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0501-4925
Didier DupontINRAE, L'Institut Agro, STLO, Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5304-6561
Isidra RecioInstitute of Food Science Research, CIAL (CSIC-UAM), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2973-5329
Reto Portmann *Agroscope, Competence Division Methods Development and Analytics, Bern, Switzerland. reto.portmann@agroscope.admin.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-8979-7439

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This protocol describes a standardized in vitro method to determine the digestibility and digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of dietary proteins. This 'INFOGEST Quant' method is an extension of our previous INFOGEST static digestion model (INFOGEST 2.0) and adds a workflow for the quantification of total protein digestibility, individual amino acid digestibility and DIAAS. The protocol was validated using in vivo data obtained by digesting the same food samples, and the results showed a high degree of agreement, confirming its relevance for nutritional assessments. To establish the DIAAS of a protein source, nonabsorbable peptides and proteins are precipitated after in vitro digestion and the resulting absorbable fraction is analyzed using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (to assess total and individual amino acids). Two alternative quantification strategies are also described: protein titration using the Kjeldahl method (to assess total nitrogen) and spectrophotometric analysis with o-phthalaldehyde (to assess total amino groups). Both alternative methods are valid only for the calculation of total digestibility and the proxy-digestible indispensable amino acid ratio, which gives an approximation of the DIAAS of the tested protein sources. Compared to existing approaches, this protocol is suitable for routine application in nutrition and food science laboratories. The preparatory steps take ~6 d, whereas the full workflow can be completed in triplicate in ~8 d. Analysis of the digesta takes an additional 3-5 d, depending on the method. The procedure requires only standard laboratory equipment and reagents and can be performed by anyone with basic training in biochemistry or a related discipline.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsDietary ProteinsDigestionModels, BiologicalAnimalsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidAmino AcidsDietary Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.