ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Predicting adverse events for risk stratification of chemotherapy based stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autologous stem-cell transplantation is a fundamental therapy for multiple myeloma. Although inpatient chemo-based stem-cell mobilization (SCM) is standard care in Germany, outpatient approaches could ease healthcare constraints. We analyzed 109 myeloma patients undergoing SCM and collection at the University Medical Center Göttingen for safety. We then trained machine learning models to predict adverse events (AEs) requiring hospitalization and to forecast AE onset timing for optimized ward management. In our cohort, 97% achieved successful collection, but 69% experienced severe AEs necessitating hospitalization. Simulations suggest a risk-stratified outpatient protocol could cut bed usage by at least one third without compromising safety. Classification models accurately predicted some AE types (e.g., elevated creatinine, ROC-AUC 1.0), though neutropenic fever remained challenging (ROC-AUC 0.67). Regression models forecast AE onset with a mean error of just over one day. These results outline a data-driven roadmap for safely adopting outpatient SCM and optimizing resource allocation in clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.