ArticleScientific reports2026
Leveraging wearable haptics for guidance in virtual rehabilitation: effects on motor control from an immersive VR setting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluating the CorPath GRX robotic system in cerebral aneurysm embolization and diagnostic angiography: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of virtual reality exercise on motor function, balance and gait function, and cognitive function in stroke patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immersive Virtual Reality (iVR) interventions have emerged as effective complements to conventional rehabilitation, with advantages in terms of flexible parametrization, extended data recording and patient engagement. Home-rehabilitation is another impactful, yet unexplored potential. A key requirement is ensuring that patients execute tasks with proper motor coordination and postural awareness: to this end, tactile sensory feedback can be introduced to enhance both immersion and motor guidance. We investigate here the efficacy and the effects on motor coordination of tactile guidance provided within an iVR rehabilitation serious game. A wearable haptic armband, delivering directional continuous and vibrotactile feedback, has been developed to guide grasping and pronosupination tasks. We evaluated the interaction on motor control and task execution using objective performance metrics, biomechanical responses, and subjective assessments, in a group of 12 healthy subjects, and a preliminary feasibility study with two participants with stroke. Findings show that haptic guidance in iVR statistically significantly enhances movement precision, reduces variability, and induces adaptive changes in muscle coordination. Feedback from clinical tests further indicates preliminary indications of usability and acceptability of the developed technology as part of a rehabilitation program. These results underscore the promise of haptic-enriched iVR systems for advancing both clinical and home-based motor rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.