ArticleScientific reports2026
Cross-lingual SMS spam detection using GAN-based augmentation for imbalanced datasets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SMS spam detection remains a critical challenge in mobile communication security, particularly when addressing the inherent class imbalance present in real-world datasets, where spam messages constitute only 13–15% of total communications. This study presents a comprehensive framework integrating advanced word embeddings, deep learning architectures, and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) for synthetic data augmentation to enhance SMS spam classification performance. A systematic evaluation is conducted across six machine learning algorithms (Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Random Forest (RF)) and two deep learning models (Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM)), combined with five embedding techniques (Term Frequency–Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), Bag of Words (BoW), Word2Vec, GloVe, Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT)), resulting in 120 experimental configurations tested both with and without data augmentation. A novel GAN-based approach is employed to generate synthetic word embeddings rather than raw text, preserving semantic coherence while addressing dataset imbalance more effectively than traditional oversampling methods (Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE), Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (ADASYN)). Experimental validation on both the monolingual UCI SMS Spam Collection and multilingual datasets demonstrates that the optimal BERT+Bi-LSTM+GAN configuration achieves exceptional performance, with F1-scores of 97.61% (monolingual) and 94.44% (multilingual), surpassing existing state-of-the-art approaches. The comprehensive evaluation framework, incorporating Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) and Cohen’s Kappa (CK), provides robust assessment for imbalanced classification scenarios. Results reveal that contextual embeddings consistently outperform traditional frequency-based methods, with BERT achieving perfect precision of 100% in baseline configurations. The study establishes strategic deployment guidelines: BERT configurations for maximum accuracy scenarios, Word2Vec approaches for balanced performance–efficiency requirements, and traditional methods for resource-constrained environments. Cross-linguistic validation confirms the universality of the approach, demonstrating only a 3.25% performance degradation in multilingual contexts. This research advances both theoretical understanding of imbalanced text classification and practical implementation of robust SMS spam detection systems, providing a methodological foundation applicable to broader cybersecurity and natural language processing challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.