Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41634074›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Dose-dependent effects of camel milk on immune function and metabolic health in weaning rats.

Alyaa Farid, Mahy Mohamed, Maryam Amr, Gehan Safwat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alyaa FaridBiotechnology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt. alyaafarid@cu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0706-347X
Mahy MohamedFaculty of Biotechnology, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts, Giza, Egypt.
Maryam AmrBiotechnology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Gehan SafwatFaculty of Biotechnology, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts, Giza, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breastfeeding cannot fulfill an infant’s nutritional needs beyond six months, necessitating the introduction of alternative milk sources. Camel milk has emerged as a promising candidate due to its rich profile of nutrients and immunomodulatory properties. This study evaluated the dose-dependent effects of camel milk on general health and immune response in post-weaning rats, with particular attention to sex-specific differences. Male and female rats were divided into: control (GI), and four treatment groups receiving 2.4 mL (GII), 3.4 mL (GIII), 4.4 mL (GIV), or 5.4 mL (GV) of camel milk daily for six weeks. Serum biochemical parameters, including lipid profile, liver and kidney function markers, and immunological responses were assessed before and after immunization with sheep red blood cells. While higher doses (4.4–5.4 mL) significantly enhanced immune response and bone health, they concurrently elevated liver and kidney function parameters. The 3.4 mL dose balanced benefits, showing significant immune enhancement and bone health improvement without adverse metabolic effects. These findings demonstrated that camel milk (3.4 mL for rats/473 mL for infants) safely enhanced immune function, while higher doses risk metabolic stress. The results supported camel milk’s potential as a nutritional supplement during weaning but emphasized the importance of dose regulation.

Indexed as

CamelusMilkAnimalsFemaleKidneyLiverMaleRatsWeaningBone healthBreastfeedingCamel milkImmune responseImmunization

Identifiers

PMID41634074
PMCPMC12873125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.