ArticleScientific data2026
Classifying land use within 80,000 mining sites on a global scale.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping global resource driven nature loss in the mining sector from 2001 to 2022.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The green energy transition has intensified global demand for critical minerals, driving the expansion of mining activities with significant environmental consequences. In response, we present a globally consistent dataset of land use and land cover classification within mining areas, providing detailed information for over 80,000 recognised mining extents across 150 countries, spanning 95,644 km² and offering global-scale insights into the mining footprint. Developed through the integration of Sentinel-2 imagery and TanDEM-X elevation change data with a Random Forest classifier, this dual-source integration supports the differentiation of functionally different but spectrally similar land use types, such as open pits and waste dumps. This distinction is critical because different land uses pose varying environmental risks. By accurately identifying specific land use types, rather than treating all disturbed or adjacent areas as equally impacted, the dataset avoids overestimating mining-affected land. Ultimately, it provides a more accurate depiction of land use within mining areas and significantly improves the reliability of environmental impact assessments in the mining sector.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.