ArticleScientific reports2026
Quantification and characterization of manufactured nanomaterials shed from face masks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Face masks are an important public health measure whose use became wide-spread during the pandemic. Manufactured nanomaterials (MNMs) have been incorporated into face masks to enhance their anti-microbial and self-cleaning properties. However, the potential toxicity of certain MNMs raises concerns regarding their use in facemasks. Limited research has addressed the airborne shedding potential of MNMs as it relates to inhalation uptake. This work aimed to address this gap by investigating the potential airborne release of TiO2 from the outer surface of three general purpose face masks, under two sets of conditions: physically stable and physically agitated. The surface of the face masks was analyzed to determine the mass fraction of TiO2 and the composition of the particles detected. Particle shedding was quantified via particle counters, particle sizers, electron microscopy, and inductively-coupled-plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Compositional analysis showed that all tested masks contained different levels of Ti ranging from 80 to 4870 µg/g of mask, with TiO2 particles detected on the surface of the fibers. Particle shedding was observed only for two of the masks under agitation with low average concentrations of 130 and 520 #/cm3. Further analysis of the shed particles did not indicate the presence of TiO2 nanoparticles. Overall, these findings suggest that while TiO2 was present in the face masks, its airborne release under typical conditions may be unlikely. Although additional efforts are needed to characterize a wider range of facemasks and expand on these data, this study contributes to the understanding of inhalation uptake from MNMs shedding to inform future risk assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.