ArticleNature communications2026
Boosting the detection of enhancer-promoter loops via normalization methods for chromatin interaction data.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- GenoME: a MoE-based generative model for individualized, multimodal prediction and perturbation of genomic profiles.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Boosting the detection of enhancer-promoter loops via normalization methods for chromatin interaction data.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate detection of enhancer-promoter loops from genome-wide chromatin interaction data is critical for understanding gene regulation. Standard normalization methods, such as matrix balancing approaches, are widely used to correct biases in chromatin contact data prior to chromatin loop detection. However, while these methods preserve structural loop signals, they often attenuate enhancer-promoter interaction signals, making these regulatory loops more difficult to detect. To address this limitation, we develop Raichu, a normalization method for chromatin contact data. Raichu identifies nearly twice as many loops as conventional normalization approaches, recovering almost all previously detected loops while uncovering thousands of additional enhancer-promoter interactions that are otherwise missed. With its improved sensitivity for regulatory loops, Raichu detects more biologically meaningful differential interactions, including those between conditions within the same cell type. Moreover, Raichu performs robustly across a wide range of sequencing depths, resolutions, species, and experimental platforms, making it a versatile tool for revealing insights into three-dimensional genome organization and transcriptional regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.