Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41633945›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2026

Awareness, Use and Acceptability of Infant Behavioural Sleep Interventions: An Initial Exploration Among Caregivers Residing in Five Countries.

Jacy Hyland, Sarah Blunden, Sarah M Honaker, Perran Boran, Prudence Millear, Nalan Karabayır, Hatice Ezgi Barış, Meltem Dinleyici, Alexandra P Metse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jacy HylandSchool of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8721-3468
Sarah BlundenAppleton Institute of Behavioural Science, Central Queensland University, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5026-1992
Sarah M HonakerIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7535-7368
Perran BoranSchool of Medicine, Department of Social Pediatrics, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9885-7656
Prudence MillearSchool of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9423-6107
Nalan KarabayırMedipol University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social Pediatrics, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8003-1952
Hatice Ezgi BarışSchool of Medicine, Department of Social Pediatrics, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3396-8002
Meltem DinleyiciEskişehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social Pediatrics, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8353-6796
Alexandra P MetseSchool of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8641-1024

Funding

University of the Sunshine Coast 0980028914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess caregivers' awareness, use and acceptability of common infant behavioural sleep strategies/interventions and explore differences in awareness and acceptability based on country of residence. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with caregivers (n = 914) of infants aged between 6 and 18 months residing in Australia, Canada, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. Caregivers were provided descriptions of common infant behavioural sleep interventions and reported their awareness of, use, and level of acceptability (using a validated measure: the acceptability of intervention measure [AIM]) for each intervention. Awareness of interventions ranged from 50% to 70% of caregivers, with significant variability by country. Overall, 70% of caregivers had used at least one intervention, with usage rates varying from 25% to 80% depending on the intervention and 30% to 55% of caregivers ceasing use prematurely. Unmodified extinction (AIM = 2.12; 5 = high acceptability), parental presence (AIM = 2.75) and modified extinction (AIM = 2.85) had lower levels of acceptability compared to responsive settling with gradual reduction (AIM = 3.48) and response-based with settling in arms (AIM = 3.51) and bed (AIM = 3.23). Significant differences in acceptability (AIM) scores by country were evident for most of the interventions. As none of the interventions were universally acceptable, a model of care that provides caregivers with information about a range of interventions and the opportunity to choose based on their preferences, parenting styles and cultural beliefs may increase the likelihood of successful intervention adoption.

Indexed as

AwarenessBehavior TherapyCaregiversHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfant BehaviorPatient Acceptance of Health CareSleepAdultAustraliaCanadaCross-Cultural ComparisonCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleacceptabilitycross‐cultureinfant sleepparental preferencessleep interventions

Identifiers

PMID41633945
PMCPMC13357938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.