ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2026
Refined trajectory smoothing and deep learning classification of human sperm motility.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in the research of artificial intelligence in andrology: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Reproductive Bioengineering: Integrating Fertility Diagnostics, Organ-on-Chip Systems, Cryobiology and Epigenetic Safety for Precision Reproductive Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Enhancement of Y-bearing sperm enrichment in swamp buffalo using a TLR7/8 agonist (R848) combined with discontinuous Percoll density gradient centrifugation.Veterinary world · 2026Article
- Implementation readiness of artificial intelligence inFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
study questionCan precise trajectory smoothing improve extraction of sperm motility features, and can deep learning on raw trajectory data enable accurate classification of sperm motility patterns? SUMMARY ANSWER: We present an approach that enhances the precision of motility parameter extraction through frequency-domain smoothing and enables accurate classification of sperm motility patterns using a deep learning model trained on raw trajectory data. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Conventional computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) systems estimate motility parameters by applying basic smoothing algorithms to derive an average path, which can result in over- or under-smoothing, leading to inaccuracies in key parameters such as beat cross frequency (BCF) and amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH). Since the identification of hyperactivated spermatozoa relies heavily on these kinematic metrics, such inaccuracies can contribute to misclassification. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This cross-sectional study analysed 2326 sperm trajectories (1931 progressive, 395 hyperactivated) recorded at 60 frames per second, derived from five individual samples, to develop and evaluate improved motility parameter extraction methods and trajectory-based classification models. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsWe compared Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), moving average, and Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) smoothing to improve average path estimation. A novel metric, path average width (PAW), was introduced to quantify lateral head displacement. An ensemble of InceptionTime models was trained on (x, y) coordinate sequences to classify spermatozoa as progressive or hyperactivated. Additional classification of motility grades was performed using trajectory endpoints. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The DCT model retaining 12 frequency components (DCT-12) produced the most consistent and symmetric average paths, leading to improved accuracy in the calculation of BCF and ALH. Our introduced PAW metric effectively distinguished between hyperactivated spermatozoa (5.5 ± 1.5 μm) and progressive spermatozoa (2.0 ± 1.3 μm). The InceptionTime-based classification model achieved 89% accuracy in differentiating progressive and hyperactivated trajectories, and 78% accuracy for predicting motility grades. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Models were trained on sperm trajectories recorded in low-viscosity media. Since sperm selection for ICSI is performed in viscous environments like low concentrations of polyvinylpyrrolidone, future training on such data is essential to improve clinical translation. Additionally, the model for classifying progressive and hyperactivated sperm was trained on a single-centre dataset (5 individuals, total of 790 trajectories) and, despite cross-validation and data augmentation, still requires independent, multi-centre validation to confirm generalizability. Absence of personal identifiers and clinical metadata precluded per-person analyses. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsBy integrating refined signal-based feature extraction with trajectory-level classification, our method addresses core limitations of CASA systems and holds potential for real-time application into ART workflows. Training on high-viscosity media could further enhance its applicability to sperm selection for ICSI. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project Grants (DP210103361 to A.N. and R.N.), the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) fellowship (Investigator Grant 2017370 to R.N.), and Monash IVF Group support. The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.