ArticleBJGP open2026
A survey of parental health-seeking behaviour, knowledge, and expectations around ear infection symptoms in children.
Article in BJGP open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn estimated half a million UK primary care consultations are due to middle ear infections annually. In children, ear infections are one of the most common reasons for antibiotic use.
aimTo describe parents' experiences and actions for their child's ear infection symptoms. DESIGN &
settingOnline survey with parents of children aged ≤10 years who had suspected ear infection symptoms in the previous 12 months in England.
methodData were collected retrospectively and through self-report. Multivariable logistic regression explored association of variables with consulting and reported prescription of antibiotics.
resultsIn total, 503 parents participated. Most parents perceived their child's symptoms as mild (25.8%) or moderate (64.6%). Consulting health care was the most reported action (90.3%); 74.0% consulted within 1-2 days. Perceived severity and duration of symptoms were associated with consulting. Parents were concerned about serious illness and the need for treatment. Other factors associated with consulting were missing work (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6 to 14.8), childcare impacts (aOR 3.1, 95% CI = 1.0 to 9.5), and fluid in child's ear (aOR 3.9, 95% CI = 1.48 to 10.5). Of consultors, 55.7% (253/454) reported receiving an antibiotic. Of all parents (503), 36.4% believed children always require antibiotics for ear infections.
conclusionMost parents consult for their child's ear infection symptoms and are prompted by impacts on daily life and perceptions of risk and treatment needs. There are knowledge gaps that, if addressed, may help to reduce primary care consultations and antibiotic use by supporting parents to manage self-limiting ear infections in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.