Trial reportBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2026
[Feasibility study of a surgical planning protocol for orthognathic surgery utilizing similarity retrieval from database: A randomized controlled trial].
Trial report in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo establish a surgical planning workflow for orthognathic surgery based on similarity retrieval from a historical patient database and to evaluate its non-inferiority with the expert's surgical plan through a randomized controlled trial.
methodsA prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 60 patients (19 males, 41 females; aged 18-35 years) scheduled for orthognathic surgery in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Peking University School of Stomatology between June 2023 and June 2024. Participants were randomly assigned to a test group (
resultsPostoperative subjective assessments demonstrated significant improvements from baseline in both groups (all
conclusionSurgical planning based on similarity retrieval from a historical database demonstrated non-inferiority when compared with the conventional expert-driven approach, as evidenced by the absence of statistically significant diffe-rences in both subjective and objective postoperative outcome measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41633597PMC12872304What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.