Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41633593›Full record

ArticleBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2026

[Calculation method of key articulator parameters based on mandibular movement trajectory].

S Shan, Y Yang, W Li, A Wen, Z Gao, X Shang, Y Wang, Y Zhao

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S ShanCenter for Digital Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry, Beijing 100081, China.
Y YangInstitute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
W LiInstitute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
A WenCenter for Digital Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry, Beijing 100081, China.
Z GaoCenter for Digital Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry, Beijing 100081, China.
X ShangInstitute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Y WangCenter for Digital Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry, Beijing 100081, China.
Y ZhaoCenter for Digital Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry, Beijing 100081, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore a mathematical method for calculating key articulator parameters based on mandibular movement trajectory data, and to compare the results of this method with reference values provided by existing foreign mandibular movement recording system, thereby establishing an algorithmic basis for developing a domestic mandibular movement recording system.

methodsTwenty healthy volunteers (7 males, 13 females) meeting inclusion criteria were recruited, with a mean age of (31±8) years. Mandibular movement data during protrusive and left/right lateral movements were recorded using the JMA Optic foreign mandibular movement recording system. A reference plane coordinate system was established using reverse engineering software, the multi-source maxillofacial data were integrated, and the coordinate systems were then unified. The condylar apex, medial condylar pole, lateral condylar pole, condylar center, empirical hinge axis point, and mandibular incisor point were selected as reference points for mandibular movement trajectories. Three-dimensional movement trajectories were generated for each reference point to calculate the sagittal condylar inclination (SCI), transverse condylar inclination (TCI), immediate side shift (ISS), incisal guidance inclination and canine guidance inclination. The calculation results from different reference points served as distinct experimental groups. Reference values provided by the JMA Optic system were used as the control group for comparative analysis.

resultsThe SCI values of all the experimental groups were significantly higher than that of the control group (

conclusionThis study proposed a mathematical method for calculating key articulator parameters based on mandibular movement trajectory data, with a clear and traceable computational pathway. The proposed method showed acceptable consistency with the JMA Optic system algorithm in calculating TCI, ISS, and canine guidance inclination, but poor consistency in calculating SCI and incisal guidance inclination. The selection of reference points directly influenced the results of parameter calculation. This mathematical method provided a reliable theoretical foundation for achieving precise, personalized articulator parameter settings.

Indexed as

Dental ArticulatorsMandibleAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansJaw Relation RecordMaleMandibular CondyleMovementYoung AdultArticulator parametersIncisal guidance inclinationMandibular movement trajectorySagittal condylar inclinationTransversal condylar inclination

Identifiers

PMID41633593
PMCPMC12872309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.