Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41633526›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2026

Sensitivity analysis of epidemic forecasting and spreading on networks with probability generating functions.

Mariah C Boudreau, William H W Thompson, Christopher M Danforth, Jean-Gabriel Young, Laurent Hébert-Dufresne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariah C BoudreauVermont Complex Systems Institute, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-1172-6497
William H W ThompsonVermont Complex Systems Institute, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1893-240X
Christopher M DanforthVermont Complex Systems Institute, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9857-2845
Jean-Gabriel YoungVermont Complex Systems Institute, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4464-2692
Laurent Hébert-DufresneVermont Complex Systems Institute, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0008-3673

Funding

Vermont INBRE Administrative Supplement 2024 AWD 118P20GM103449 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI Julie Dragon · 2012 to 2026
$58.4M
Using Dengue Controlled Human Infection Model to Identify Adaptive Immune Correlates of ProtectionP20GM125498 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI Kristen Pierce · 2018 to 2026
$24.9M
IDeA Networks of Biomedical Research ExcellenceNational Science FoundationNIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103449NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM125498NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemic forecasting tools embrace the stochasticity and heterogeneity of disease spread to predict the growth and size of outbreaks. Conceptually, stochasticity and heterogeneity are often modelled as branching processes or as percolation on contact networks. Mathematically, probability generating functions (PGFs) provide a flexible and efficient tool to describe these models and quickly produce forecasts. While their predictions are probabilistic-i.e. distributions of outcome-they depend deterministically on the input distribution of transmission statistics and/or contact structure. Since these inputs can be noisy data or models of high dimension, traditional sensitivity analyses are computationally prohibitive and are therefore rarely used. Here, we use statistical condition estimation to measure the sensitivity of stochastic polynomials representing noisy generating functions. In doing so, we can separate the stochasticity of their forecasts from potential noise in their input. For standard epidemic models, we find that predictions are most sensitive at the critical epidemic threshold (basic reproduction number R0 = 1) only if the transmission is sufficiently homogeneous (dispersion parameter k > 0.3). Surprisingly, in heterogeneous systems (k ≤ 0.3), sensitivity is highest for values of R0 > 1. We expect our methods will improve the transparency and applicability of PGFs as epidemic forecasting tools.

Indexed as

EpidemicsModels, BiologicalForecastingHumansPrediction AlgorithmsProbabilityStochastic Processesbranching processesepidemic forecastingpercolationprobability generating functionssensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID41633526
PMCPMC13348159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.