Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Shows a Lower Incidence of Radiologic Adjacent Segment Pathology Than Conventional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

backgroundRadiologic adjacent segment pathology (R-ASP) is a significant consequence following lumbar spinal fusion, potentially resulting from compromised integrity of posterior structures. Few studies have directly compared the incidence of R-ASP between minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Thus, the objective of this study was to analyze risk factors for R-ASP and compare clinical outcomes between minimally invasive LLIF supplemented with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and open conventional PLIF.

methodsThis study included 107 patients who underwent one- or two-segment spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar disease. Fifty-one patients underwent minimally invasive LLIF and 56 received conventional PLIF. Factors related to occurrence of R-ASP were investigated by analyzing demographic profiles, radiological results, and clinical outcomes. Correlations between clinical results were determined based on fusion methods and the presence of R-ASP. Patient-related factors, preoperative spinal diagnosis, number of fused segments, and radiologic findings were analyzed. Clinical outcomes were also assessed. Cox regression survival analysis was performed to determine risk factors for R-ASP. Annual incidence and cumulative survival rate of R-ASP were calculated using the life-table method and Kaplan-Meier survival curve.

resultsCox proportional hazards regression analysis identified three significant risk factors for R-ASP: PLIF over LLIF (

conclusionMinimally invasive fusion techniques that preserve posterior structures might slow the progression of degenerative changes in adjacent segments. To reduce R-ASP, preoperative assessment of facet degeneration and adequate restoration of sagittal balance during surgery are crucial considerations.