ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Sex-disparate safety profile of Obinutuzumab: a pharmacovigilance analysis using the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionObinutuzumab, a type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody used for treating B-cell hematologic malignancies, improves outcomes and prolongs progression-free survival. However, its use is linked to adverse reactions that vary by gender. This study aims to assess adverse event signals related to Obinutuzumab using FAERS data, thereby providing safety insights for clinical application.
methodsFAERS data from Q4 2013 to Q4 2024 were processed in R with duplicate reports removed. Drug names were standardized using Medex UIMA 1.3.8, and adverse events were classified according to MedDRA v26.1. The disproportionality analysis was conducted using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) methods to evaluate adverse reaction signals related to Obinutuzumab. A stratified analysis by gender was performed to enhance the accuracy of data interpretation.
resultsA total of 14,450,774 case reports, 70,790,109 drug cases, and 41,401,915 REAC records were collected. The results showed that although the proportion of male patients in overall adverse event reports was higher, female patients exhibited significantly higher ROR and PRR in systemic adverse reactions such as blood and lymphatic system disorders, suggesting that women may face greater risks. At the Preferred Term (PT) level, strong signals were observed for common adverse events such as myelosuppression and febrile neutropenia. Additionally, abnormal signals for pure red cell aplasia and enteroviral meningitis were prominent only in females.
conclusionObinutuzumab is associated with significant adverse event risks, notably higher in females, highlighting the need for enhanced safety monitoring and further exploration of gender-specific mechanisms in adverse event development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.