Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41633033›Full record

ArticleJournal of health economics2026

The impact of immunotherapy on reductions in cancer mortality: Evidence from Medicare.

Danea Horn, Abby Alpert, Mark Duggan, Mireille Jacobson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health economics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danea HornCenter for Translational and Policy Research on Precision Medicine, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, United States; UCSF Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies and UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States; The work was primarily conducted at Stanford University, United States. Electronic address: danea.horn@ucsf.edu.
Abby AlpertUniversity of Pennsylvania, Wharton School and NBER, United States. Electronic address: alpertab@wharton.upenn.edu.
Mark DugganStanford University and NBER, United States. Electronic address: mgduggan@stanford.edu.
Mireille JacobsonUniversity of Southern California and NBER, United States. Electronic address: mireillj@usc.edu.

Funding

BUILDING THE EVIDENCE BASE FOR APPROPRIATE AND EFFICIENT IMPLEMENTATION OF EMERGING GENOMIC TESTS FOR DISEASE MANAGEMENT AND SCREENINGR01HG011792 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PHILLIPS, KATHRYN A · 2021 to 2025
$4.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy is a breakthrough innovation in cancer care, but it is also among the most expensive treatments, with costs exceeding $150,000 per patient. We study the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the most widely used class of immunotherapy drugs. In 2022, ICIs accounted for 44% of the $17.5 billion Medicare Part B cancer drug spending. We focus on metastatic melanoma, the first approved indication for ICIs. While overall cancer mortality rates declined since the 1990s, melanoma mortality rates increased through the early 2010s. Following the first ICI approvals in 2011 and 2014, melanoma mortality declined sharply. Using traditional Medicare claims, we estimate the impact of the introduction of ICIs on healthcare utilization, costs, and 1-year survival for patients with metastatic melanoma, relative to metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), where ICIs were not approved until 2017. Variation in approval timing allows us to isolate the effect of ICIs from broader cancer care trends. We find that ICIs reduced 1-year mortality by 6.2%. Since about 1 in 5 metastatic melanoma patients received ICIs, this implies a 28.0% reduction among treated patients. The introduction of ICIs also reduced chemotherapy and radiation use, but increased Medicare spending by 59.3% or about 260% among ICI-treated patients. Accounting for life expectancy gains beyond one year, the benefits of ICIs for melanoma patients appear comparable, or potentially even greater, than the substantial added Medicare costs. Nonetheless, ICI use remains relatively low given large survival benefits and few alternative treatments, suggesting that costs and other barriers limit patient access.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyMedicareMelanomaNeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleUnited StatesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsCancer careCancer mortalityDifference-in-differencesHealthcare costsHealthcare utilizationImmunotherapyInnovationMedicareMelanomaPharmaceutical spending

Identifiers

PMID41633033
PMCPMC13464448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.