ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Assessing the Feasibility, Usability, Acceptability, and Efficacy of an AI Chatbot for Sleep Promotion: Quasi-Experimental Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human-Centered AI in Sleep Health Management: Scoping Review of Stakeholder Perspectives and Co-Design Practices.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- User Acceptability and Adoption of AI-Generated Lifestyle Intervention Recommendations: Scoping Review and Theoretical Integration.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPoor sleep is a concerning public health problem in the United States. Previous sleep interventions often face barriers such as high costs, limited accessibility, and low user engagement. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies offer a novel approach to overcoming these limitations. In response, our team developed a prototype AI sleep chatbot powered by a large language model to deliver personalized, accessible sleep support.
objectiveThis study aimed to examine the feasibility, usability, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the AI chatbot for sleep promotion.
methodsWe conducted a quasi-experimental, single-group study with adults in the United States aged 18 to 75 years who self-reported poor sleep. The chatbot was integrated into a commercially available messaging app. Participants were asked to engage with a virtual sleep therapist via texting over 2 weeks. The chatbot provided ongoing, individualized sleep guidance and adapted recommendations based on participants' prior conversations. Feasibility, usability, and acceptability were descriptively summarized. Sleep was assessed using questionnaires before and after the intervention.
resultsOf the 107 adults who enrolled in the study, 88 (82.2%) completed chatbot registration. Among these 88 participants, 65 (73.9%) initiated interactions, and 44 (50%) completed the 2-week intervention. The final analysis included 42 adults (mean age 36, SD 11 years; n=12, 28.6% male). On average, participants engaged with the chatbot for 58 (SD 42) minutes, with each chat session lasting approximately 9 (SD 6) minutes. Most reported favorable experiences with the chatbot. The average usability score was 85.2 (SD 10.7) out of 100, which was well above the benchmark of 68. The chatbot was rated as highly acceptable, with a satisfaction score of 27.3 (SD 4.1) out of 32. All participants perceived the chatbot as effective, with ratings ranging from "slightly effective" to "extremely effective." The preliminary evidence showed improved sleep outcomes after chatbot use: total sleep time increased by 1.4 hours (P<.001); sleep onset latency decreased by 30.9 minutes (P<.001); sleep efficiency increased by 7.8% (P=.007); and scores improved for perceived sleep quality (mean difference [MD] -5.4; P<.001), insomnia severity (MD -7.9; P<.001), daytime sleepiness (MD -4.7; P<.001), and sleep hygiene skills (MD -13.2; P<.001). No significant change was observed in sleep environment (MD -1.1; P=.16).
conclusionsOur AI chatbot demonstrated satisfactory feasibility, usability, and acceptability. Improvements were observed following chatbot use, although causality cannot be established. These findings highlight the potential of integrating state-of-the-art large language models into behavioral interventions for sleep promotion. Future research should include objective sleep measurements and conduct randomized controlled trials to validate the study findings. If confirmed, this AI chatbot could be scaled to support sleep health on a broader level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.