Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41632959›Full record

ReviewJMIR AI2026

Explainable AI Approaches in Federated Learning: Systematic Review.

Titus Tunduny, Bernard Shibwabo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Titus TundunySchool of Computing & Engineering Sciences, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9724-8085
Bernard ShibwaboSchool of Computing & Engineering Sciences, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0827-9857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has, in the recent past, experienced a rebirth with the growth of generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Bard. These systems are trained with billions of parameters and have enabled widespread accessibility and understanding of AI among different user groups. Widespread adoption of AI has led to the need for understanding how machine learning (ML) models operate to build trust in them. An understanding of how these models generate their results remains a huge challenge that explainable AI seeks to solve. Federated learning (FL) grew out of the need to have privacy-preserving AI by having ML models that are decentralized but still share model parameters with a global model.

objectiveThis study sought to examine the extent of development of the explainable AI field within the FL environment in relation to the main contributions made, the types of FL, the sectors it is applied to, the models used, the methods applied by each study, and the databases from which sources are obtained.

methodsA systematic search in 8 electronic databases, namely, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, PubMed, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Mendeley, BASE, and Google Scholar, was undertaken.

resultsA review of 26 studies revealed that research on explainable FL is steadily growing despite being concentrated in Europe and Asia. The key determinants of FL use were data privacy and limited training data. Horizontal FL remains the preferred approach for federated ML, whereas post hoc explainability techniques were preferred.

conclusionsThere is potential for development of novel approaches and improvement of existing approaches in the explainable FL field, especially for critical areas.

trial registrationOSF Registries 10.17605/OSF.IO/Y85WA; https://osf.io/y85wa.

Indexed as

explainable artificial intelligenceexplainable federated artificial intelligencefederated learningmodel interpretabilityprivacy-preserving machine learning

Identifiers

PMID41632959
PMCPMC12914235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.